Advancing Justice Through Technology: A Comparative Analysis of Data-Driven Approaches to The Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases in The USA and Pakistan

Abstract

In this paper, the burden of proof in criminal justice is examined concerning technological innovations: The United States and Pakistan A Comparative Analysis. This paper looks at how digital evidence, much like forensic technologies and AI have impacted the legal proceedings, especially on aspects of discovery up come to scrap for proof. The research uses a mixed methods approach through case analysis and interviews with legal professionals to illustrate some of the benefits and barriers on deploying technical solutions in criminal justice. The study concludes that these innovations improve the reliability and efficiency of legal processes while posing significant challenges for developing legals frameworks, reliable evidencing practice or regulations, as well as clear ethical standards. The findings illustrate the divide between digitally rich and poor law systems, highlighting that effective legal reforms must be accompanied by sustained training for justice sector officials with a nuanced approach buttressing core human rights such as data privacy or presumption of innocence. This research adds to the rich literature on technology in justice and provides important lessons for policy makers, legal professionals, academics who wish to transform the criminal justice system of the future by leveraging digital technologies.